Year : 2018 | Volume
: 20 | Issue : 1 | Page : 1--6
Chest drain size: Does it matter?
David J McCracken, Ioannis Psallidas, Najib M Rahman
Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
Pleural disease is common with an increasing incidence and so represents a significant proportion of the workload for respiratory physicians. Chest drain insertion continues to be considered a mainstay of pleural disease management however the optimum drain size required for various pleural conditions remains unclear. Traditionally large-bore chest drains were inserted through a surgical technique of blunt dissection however smaller bore Seldinger (guidewire) drains have dramatically increased in popularity in recent times most likely due to ease of insertion and perceived increased patient tolerability. Despite British Thoracic Society Guidelines advocating a preference for small-bore chest drains, their use remains controversial. We aim to review the literature in each category of pleural disease including pneumothorax, malignant pleural effusion and pleural infection, regarding chest drain size, comparing the role, effectiveness and complications of each.
Dr. David J McCracken
Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, Oxford
|How to cite this article:|
McCracken DJ, Psallidas I, Rahman NM. Chest drain size: Does it matter?.Eurasian J Pulmonol 2018;20:1-6
|How to cite this URL:|
McCracken DJ, Psallidas I, Rahman NM. Chest drain size: Does it matter?. Eurasian J Pulmonol [serial online] 2018 [cited 2020 Jun 5 ];20:1-6
Available from: http://www.eurasianjpulmonol.com/article.asp?issn=2148-5402;year=2018;volume=20;issue=1;spage=1;epage=6;aulast=McCracken;type=0