• Users Online: 443
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 20  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 1-6

Chest drain size: Does it matter?

Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK

Correspondence Address:
Dr. David J McCracken
Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, Oxford
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/ejop.ejop_2_18

Rights and Permissions

Pleural disease is common with an increasing incidence and so represents a significant proportion of the workload for respiratory physicians. Chest drain insertion continues to be considered a mainstay of pleural disease management however the optimum drain size required for various pleural conditions remains unclear. Traditionally large-bore chest drains were inserted through a surgical technique of blunt dissection however smaller bore Seldinger (guidewire) drains have dramatically increased in popularity in recent times most likely due to ease of insertion and perceived increased patient tolerability. Despite British Thoracic Society Guidelines advocating a preference for small-bore chest drains, their use remains controversial. We aim to review the literature in each category of pleural disease including pneumothorax, malignant pleural effusion and pleural infection, regarding chest drain size, comparing the role, effectiveness and complications of each.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded823    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal